admin 管理员组

文章数量: 1086019


2024年4月13日发(作者：linux kill命令)

InnoLux

群創光電

#

Quality Process Audit For Connector

保管單位

storage

保存年限

Retention Period

品管

3年

8.0 Failure Analysis and Rework

失效分析

&

重工

Audit Criteria

Working Procedures

Is there a rework and failure analysis procedures/flows for the specific

product being built?

特殊產品的重工及失效分析程序/流程有無建立？

Is there a procedure to handle NTF PCBA/connectors?

是否有處理NTF物料的程序?

Does the procedures clearly specify the machines, equipment, tools,

fixtures, and program to be used?

程序是否明確說明了使用的機台,設備,治具,夾具,以及應用程式等

Are the rework and failure analysis procedures revision controlled and

approved by authorized personnel prior to issue?

重工及失效分析的程序的修訂在發行前是否由經權威人士管制和認

可?

Are the changes identified in the document or otherwise?

變更有無在文件中或其它地方確認？

Is there a master list of these changes?

這些變更有無管制清冊?

Rework & F.A.

Is the rework procedures and materials flow (after rework) readily

available?

重工程序及原料流動(重工後)是否易於使用?

Are all the necessary documents available at the rework station? (e.g.,

schematic, layout, BOM, etc)

在重工站,所有必需的文件是否都有效？(如:schematic,layout,BOM等)

Is the non-conformance analyzed by appointed person?

不良分析是否有指定人員進行?

Is reworked part re-input to manufacturing test and inspection

stations?

重工後的零部件有無重回到制程測試和檢驗工站?

Are the test/inspection marking removed prior to re-input to

manufacturing line? 在重返生產線前,測試/檢查標識有無移除？

Are failed materials repaired within 2 working days?

不合格品能否在2個工作日內完成修復?

Is repair recording sheet maintained, correctly filled in, and review on a

regular basis?

修復記錄有無保留,正確地填寫並定期檢查?

Are NTF materials tested to screen out intermittent failures?

有無測試NTF原料以篩選出間歇性失效?

Is there a system to handle materials sent to rework for more than 3

times? Define the process.

有無系統管控被送去重工3次以上的原料？詳細說明過程？

Equipment Control

Are the tools/fixtures properly identified?

模具/治具是否正確標識?

Are torque measurement check on a regular basis (minimum

once/day) and documented? (if applicable)

扭矩測量檢查是否定期(最少一次/天)進行並備有証明文件(若適用)?

Are the connector bit size and torque setting appropriate? (if

applicable)

Connector的尺寸及扭矩設置是否適當(若適用)?

Are actions taken if torque measurement is out of control spec? (if

applicable)

如果扭矩尺寸超過了管制規格,有無採取指施(若適用)?

Is solder iron temperature check on a regular basis (minimum

once/day) and documented?

焊鐵溫度有無定期(每天至少一次)檢查並有證明資料?

Is action taken if solder iron temperature is out of control spec?

若焊鐵溫度超出管制規格,有無採取指施？

Is the (test) equipment used for measuring/inspection calibrated?

量測/檢驗用(測試)設備有無校正？

Is the condition of test equipment, test program, and test fixture

verified before start of production?

在生產開始前,有無驗正測試設備,測試程序及測試治具的狀況？

Auditor's Comments

Supplier's Self

Scoring

Y=1 N=0 N/A=X

INNOLUX's

Scoring

Y=1 N=0

8.1是1

8.2

是

1

8.3

是

1

8.4

是

1

8.5

是

1

8.6

是

1

8.7

是

1

8.8

是

1

8.9

是

1

8.10

是

1

8.11

是

1

8.12

是

1

8.13

是

1

8.14

是

1

8.15

是

1

8.16

是

1

8.17

是

1

8.18

是

1

8.19

是

1

8.20

是

1

8.21

是

1

8.22

是

1

8.23

是

1

8.24

Is action taken when condition of test equipment, test program, or test

fixture is no good?

若測試設備,測試程序或測試治具的狀況NG,有無採取指施？

Operator

Is the operator properly trained and has sufficient knowledge to

perform the rework and failure analysis?

操作員有無培訓合格及是否有足夠的技能執行重工和失效分析?

Is the rework/F.A. operator following the working instructions?

重工/F.A.操作員有無遵循操作說明？

Is the rework/F.A. operator handling method appropriate, i.e., to avoid

damage or mixing?

重工/F.A.操作員有無遵循恰當的操作方法,即是否能避免損傷或混

Is the rework/F.A. operator wearing gloves/finger cots when handling

PCBA/connectors?

重工/F.A.操作員在處理PCBA/Connector時有無戴手套/指套?

Materials Handling & Identification

Are the materials, including consumables, at manual insertion and

rework area clearly identified? (e.g., part number, description)

手工插入和重工區的原料,包括易耗品有無明確標識(如料號和描

Are the PCBAs/connectors properly stored to avoid mixing or

damage?

PCBAs/connector有無正確的存儲以避免混料或損傷?

For product failed test, is the non-conformance product identified,

recorded, and segregated?

對於產品失效測試,不良品是否有標識,記錄及隔離?

Are boxes or wagons used for defective goods clearly marked as

such?

不良品所用盒子或推車是否有同樣的明確標識?

Is there any system to identify products after rework?

有無重工後產品的鑒定系統？

Are the test/inspection marking removed prior to re-input to

manufacturing line?

在重返生產線前,測試/檢查標識有無移除？

Environment Control

Are temperature and humidity monitored on a regular basis? How

frequent?

是否定時對溫度溼度 進行監控?頻率如何?

Are there appropriate controls on temperature and humidity?

針對溫度 溼度是否有適當的管控?

Are action taken when temperature or humidity out of control range?

溫度 溼度超出管控範圍時有無採取措施?

是

1

8.25

是

1

8.26

是

1

8.27

是

1

8.28

是

1

8.29

是

1

8.30

是

1

8.31

是

1

8.32

是

1

8.33

是

1

8.34

是

1

8.35

是

1

8.36

是

1

8.37

是

Score Obtained

Maximum Score

Score Percentage

Pass Percentage

1

37

37

100.00%

0

0

#DIV/0!

表單編號Form No.：PI3QM-0075-15(V01)

80%80%

頁數/總頁數Page/Total Pages：9/14

版權屬於群創所有.禁止任何未經授權的使用.

The copyright belongs to InnoLux. Any unauthorized use is prohibited.


本文标签： 是否 測試 重工 程序 檢查

版权声明：本文标题：Quality Process Audit For Connector——连接器品质制程稽核资料 内容由网友自发贡献，该文观点仅代表作者本人， 转载请联系作者并注明出处：http://roclinux.cn/b/1712950191a613900.html， 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务，不拥有所有权，不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容，一经查实，本站将立刻删除。